DHS Responds to Gov. Newsom After Federal Raids on California Cannabis Farms Raise Concerns About Underage Workers

Federal and state tensions grew this week after a series of immigration enforcement operations in California uncovered underage, unaccompanied migrant children working on marijuana farms.

The discovery set off a round of public statements from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Gov. Gavin Newsom’s office, bringing renewed attention to questions about labor protections, oversight, and who holds responsibility when vulnerable young people are involved.

The situation began in Ventura County, where Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) carried out a targeted raid on a cannabis cultivation site. The operation was recorded by bystanders and shared widely online, quickly sparking national debate.

Footage showed federal agents moving through the property and detaining several individuals suspected of working without proper authorization.

While the raid itself drew attention, it was DHS’s later announcement that deepened the controversy: eight unaccompanied migrant children were found working at the site. Officials noted that the young individuals appeared to be in unsafe working conditions, raising alarms about illegal labor activity.

In a public statement posted on X, DHS said that ICE and Customs and Border Protection officers had “rescued eight unaccompanied migrant children from what appeared to be potential labor violations and unsafe circumstances” at the Ventura County facility. The agency added that broader concerns remain about the care and oversight of unaccompanied minors who arrive in the United States.

The remarks were widely shared and interpreted as a direct response to Gov. Newsom, who had previously criticized federal immigration actions in the state. DHS’s post emphasized the need for coordinated efforts to protect minors, especially in areas where unregulated or poorly supervised work sites may exist.

Although the situation is still developing, the discovery has renewed conversation about how labor laws are enforced in industries that operate under a mix of state and federal regulations.

It also prompted discussions about how both state and federal authorities can improve safeguards for minors who may be at risk of exploitation—intentionally or unintentionally—when they enter the workforce without support or guidance.

The incident underscores ongoing questions: How do agencies share responsibility for oversight? What safeguards should be strengthened? And how can young people who arrive without family support be better protected from unsafe situations?

What remains clear is that the Ventura County discovery has placed a spotlight on an issue that extends far beyond a single raid. It has opened a conversation about enforcement, policy gaps, and the continued need for vigilance when it comes to the well-being of vulnerable children.